Higdon v. State ( 1990 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentence. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in assessing thirty (30) excess points against appellant on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. However, even with the deletion of these points the trial court’s sentence is well within the permitted and recommended range of sentences set out in the guidelines.

    ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 89-2228

Judges: Anstead, Glickstein, Kahn, Martin

Filed Date: 8/8/1990

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024