All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
1991-03 |
-
PER CURIAM. The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that it was error for the trial court to find the defendant guilty of possession of cannabis. Munroe v. State, 514 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1987); Ashenoff v. State, 391 So.2d 289 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1980). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence and remand with instructions to the trial court to discharge the appellant in this case.
SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 90-02782
Citation Numbers: 576 So. 2d 433
Judges: Campbell, Ryder, Schoonover
Filed Date: 3/22/1991
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024