All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
1991-12 |
-
PER CURIAM. Appellant was entitled to notice from his withdrawing attorney and from the trial court in allowing the withdrawal. Neither the attorney’s motion nor the trial court’s order reflects such notice to have been given. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Clement v. Marcus, Stowell & Beye, Inc., 516 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 91-0694
Citation Numbers: 588 So. 2d 1099, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026, 1991 WL 253844
Judges: Dell, Glickstein, Polen
Filed Date: 12/4/1991
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024