All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
1991-12 |
-
WIGGINTON, Judge. Appellant’s conviction is affirmed but the sentencing order is remanded to the trial court with directions that the court either set the amount for the payment of the medical and counseling expenses of the victim or, if that amount is not yet determinable, provide a procedure for determining the amount and, at the appropriate time, set the amount. See King v. State, 546 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); McCaskill v. State, 520 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988);
*470 and James v. State, 499 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).ERVIN and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 91-580
Citation Numbers: 589 So. 2d 469, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12836, 1991 WL 259455
Judges: Ervin, Wigginton, Wolf
Filed Date: 12/3/1991
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024