Ingram Enterprises v. Langston , 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334 ( 1993 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Appellants seek a remand in this workers’ compensation appeal, showing that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. In these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

    REVERSED AND REMANDED.

    BOOTH, SMITH and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 92-2079

Citation Numbers: 611 So. 2d 115, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334, 1993 WL 9001

Judges: Booth, Smith, Wolf

Filed Date: 1/21/1993

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024