Woodard v. State , 258 So. 3d 489 ( 2018 )

PER CURIAM.

*490See Tennyson v. State, 254 So.3d 510, 517-18, 2018 WL 1734490, at *5-6 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 11, 2018) (Affirming the conviction and sentence of Woodard's codefendant because "there is no indication that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied defense counsel's request for impeachment on recross examination, and any possible error would be harmless.").