All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
1993-10 |
-
PER CURIAM. We affirm the judgment because, in our view, the appellee’s claim was entitled to priority. We strike, as unnecessary to the adjudication, so much of the order as states that the assignment is void. Because the issue may recur, we note that the assignee attorney is not an insider. See § 726.102(7), Fla.Stat. (1991). The parties’ attention is invited to the terms of subsection 726.104(1), Florida Statutes (1991).
Affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 93-270
Citation Numbers: 624 So. 2d 868, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10313, 1993 WL 406603
Judges: Cope, Hubbart, Schwartz
Filed Date: 10/12/1993
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024