Howard v. State , 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12502 ( 1993 )

PER CURIAM.

The denial of the defendant’s motion for belated appeal is affirmed without prejudice to a timely, successive motion for belated appeal containing the necessary allegations under oath. See Gilliam v. State, 611 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

SCHOONOVER, AC.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.