Hill v. State , 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3900 ( 1994 )

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We agree with the state, and the appellant concedes, that since the records of this court reflect that no mandate was issued in the earlier appeal, the resen-tencing imposed while the case was pending in the supreme court was a nullity.

ANSTEAD, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.