D.M. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services , 695 So. 2d 739 ( 1996 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We affirm the Department’s order, which in turn rejected certain conclusions of law recommended by the hearing officer. See § 120.57(l)(b)10, Fla.Stat. (1993) (“The agency in its final order may reject or modify the conclusions of law and interpretation of administrative rules in the recommended order.”).

    ERVIN and KAHN, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., dissents.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 95-3366

Citation Numbers: 695 So. 2d 739

Judges: Benton, Ervin, Kahn

Filed Date: 9/11/1996

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/30/2022