All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
1996-09 |
-
PER CURIAM. We affirm the Department’s order, which in turn rejected certain conclusions of law recommended by the hearing officer. See § 120.57(l)(b)10, Fla.Stat. (1993) (“The agency in its final order may reject or modify the conclusions of law and interpretation of administrative rules in the recommended order.”).
ERVIN and KAHN, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., dissents.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 95-3366
Citation Numbers: 695 So. 2d 739
Judges: Benton, Ervin, Kahn
Filed Date: 9/11/1996
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/30/2022