Slizyk v. Smilack , 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8180 ( 1998 )

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.

We conclude that as to all appealed orders, save two, there is either no jurisdiction to review them or the claim of error was not preserved by timely objection below. As for the order terminating temporary alimony and the order denying temporary suit money, although there is conflicting evidence concerning the husband’s financial condition, the court’s ruling is supported by evidence in the record.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.