All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
1999-07 |
-
PER CURIAM. There is no basis for the trial court’s finding that appehee pled comparative negligence, and no competent substantial evidence supports the court’s findings that appellant knew or should have known ap-pellee-was impaired or that appellee was impaired. Accordingly, the trial court erred in determining that appellant was comparatively neghgent and in reducing appellant’s damage award. We reverse.
*630 On remand the trial court shall enter judgment for the full amount for appellant.BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 98-1573
Citation Numbers: 737 So. 2d 629, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10062, 1999 WL 533715
Judges: Barfield, Miner, Padovano
Filed Date: 7/27/1999
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024