Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Pinecrest Ltd. Partnership , 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12218 ( 1999 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We affirm the final summary judgment as the trial court properly enforced the insurance policy in accordance with its plain language and entered judgment concerning the attorney’s fee issue in favor of appellees. See Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So.2d 339 (Fla.1990); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So.2d 52 (Fla.1987); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Lamm, 218 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d *734DCA), cert. denied, 225 So.2d 529 (Fla.1969).

    Affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 99-1018

Citation Numbers: 739 So. 2d 733, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12218

Judges: Nesbitt, Shevin, Sorondo

Filed Date: 9/13/1999

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024