All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2000-03 |
-
PER CURIAM. We conclude that the University’s final order is supported by competent substantial evidence and that the hearing panel did not err in excluding the appellant’s proffer of polygraph evidence and similar fact evidence. Accordingly, we affirm.
MINER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR. WOLF, J., DISSENTS WITH OPINION.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 1D98-4594
Citation Numbers: 752 So. 2d 1253, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2617, 2000 WL 255980
Judges: Miner, Padovano, Wolf
Filed Date: 3/9/2000
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024