All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2000-03 |
-
PER CURIAM. This is an appeal of an order denying appellant’s motion to stay arbitration. Ini
*1254 tially, we deny appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. The order was properly ap-pealable as a non-final order because it determined appellee’s entitlement to proceed with arbitration. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(v).On the merits, we agree that the trial court correctly decided that appellee did not waive its demand for arbitration.
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 1D99-578
Citation Numbers: 752 So. 2d 1253, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2613, 2000 WL 256036
Judges: Booth, Ervin, Wolf
Filed Date: 3/9/2000
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024