University Pine Retirement v. Myers , 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2623 ( 2000 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    In this workers’ compensation case, the employer/earrier (E/C) petition this court for a writ of certiorari to review an order entered by the judge of compensation claims (JCC). The order at issue granted the claimant’s motion for a protective order and provided that a rehabilitation nurse hired by the E/C could not communicate ex parte with any health care provider involved in this case because the nurse was an independent contractor, not a “direct ‘in-house’ employee” of the E/C. In support of their petition, the E/C argue only that rehabilitation providers are included in section 440.13(4)(e), Florida Statutes, as among those authorized to conduct ex parte communications with a claimant’s health care providers. We deny the petition.

    KAHN, WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, CONCUR.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 1D99-2546

Citation Numbers: 752 So. 2d 1259, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2623, 2000 WL 266345

Judges: Kahn, Padovano, Webster

Filed Date: 3/13/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024