Jones v. Seabury & Smith, Inc. , 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16837 ( 2000 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellee’s, Teshia Jones, motion for summary judgment is not a request for affirmative relief; it could not *660have been maintained independently of the appellant’s cause of action. See Heineken v. Heineken, 683 So.2d 194, 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Therefore, this order is not renewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv).

    ALLEN, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 1D00-4129

Citation Numbers: 773 So. 2d 659, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16837, 2000 WL 1867525

Judges: Allen, Benton, Browning

Filed Date: 12/22/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024