South Florida Public Telecommunication v. Salony , 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 79 ( 2001 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We do not reach the merits of this case because appellants’ arguments are not preserved for appeal. In order to preserve an argument for appeal, it must be presented to the judge of compensation claims “in substantially the same detail as the carrier would later wish to urge upon us.” Showell Farms v. Carter, 633 So.2d 477, 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

    The order of the JCC is, therefore, AFFIRMED.

    BOOTH, KAHN, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 1D00-265

Citation Numbers: 775 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 79, 2001 WL 9932

Judges: Booth, Browning, Kahn

Filed Date: 1/5/2001

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024