Lowman v. State ( 2001 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We affirm all issues. In regard to appellant’s specific claim that section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1997), is unconstitutionally vague and denies equal protection of the law, we note that this court recently rejected a similar challenge *1149to the statute in State v. McClellan, 765 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

    AFFIRMED.

    ERVIN, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 1D00-544

Judges: Ervin, Lewis, Webster

Filed Date: 3/15/2001

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024