![]() |
All Courts |
![]() |
Federal Courts |
![]() |
US Federal District Court Cases |
![]() |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
![]() |
2001-09 |
-
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
On Motion for Certification
PER CURIAM.
We grant defendant’s motion to certify a question of great public importance. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Motion granted; question certified.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2101
Judges: Green, Ramirez, Shevin
Filed Date: 9/12/2001
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024