Disanto v. State ( 2002 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the Commission’s findings of fact, we affirm. Botner v. State, Dep’t of Admin. Div. of Ret., 438 So.2d 94, 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Division of Ret. v. Allen, 395 So.2d 1192, 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Kennedy v. Wiggins, 368 So.2d 454, 455-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 3D01-2161

Judges: Goderich, Schwartz, Sorondo

Filed Date: 5/22/2002

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024