George's Crane Service, Inc. v. Signal Service Industries, Inc. ( 2002 )

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee’s renewed motion for directed verdict and entering final judgment. We agree with the trial court that the indemnification agreement did not meet the requirements of section 725.06(2), Florida Statutes (1999), since it did not give a “specific consideration” for the indemnification that was “provided for” in the contract.

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.