Vega v. Shitama , 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12189 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    The Court has determined that because the appellant’s motion for rehearing was not timely served, it did not delay rendition of the final judgment. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530; Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Consequently, the appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed and this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the order on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

    DISMISSED.

    ERVIN, BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 1D03-2642

Citation Numbers: 855 So. 2d 147, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12189, 2003 WL 21939284

Judges: Barfield, Davis, Ervin

Filed Date: 8/14/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024