Kailing v. State , 858 So. 2d 1094 ( 2003 )

SHARP, W.,

concurring and concurring specially.

I concur with the majority that this case should be affirmed, but I would add that it should be affirmed without prejudice to raise the issues in a Rule 3.850 motion.¹ See Paul v. State, 830 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA2002).

1 . Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.