All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2004-07 |
-
PER CURIAM. D.Z. and D.P. (the Relatives), the maternal great-grandfather and the maternal grandmother, respectively, of D.A.G. and T.G., seek review of the trial court’s nonfi-nal order denying their motion for visitation. We do not have jurisdiction to review this nonfinal order as an interlocutory appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3). However, we elect to treat the Relatives’
*483 timely filed notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition. See Sullivan v. Sapp, 866 So.2d 28 (Fla.2004); A.D. v. KS. (In re S.D.), 869 So.2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA2004).Petition denied.
DAVIS, CANADY, and WALLACE, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 2D03-4375
Citation Numbers: 878 So. 2d 482, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11343, 2004 WL 1698071
Judges: Canady, Davis, Wallace
Filed Date: 7/30/2004
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024