All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2004-09 |
-
NORTHCUTT, Judge. In this certiorari proceeding Daniel Butler challenges the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reduce, mitigate, or modify his sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). Butler contended he was entitled to credit against his prison sentence for time spent in jail awaiting sentencing. We deny the petition for writ of certiorari. See Brantley v. Holloway, 685 So.2d 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We note, however, that Butler’s argument is cognizable under rule 3.800(a). See Tinker v. State, 870 So.2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Our disposition is without prejudice to Butler’s right to file a motion for relief under that rule.
Petition for certiorari denied.
CANADY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 2D03-4139
Citation Numbers: 884 So. 2d 381, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13444, 2004 WL 2008268
Judges: Canady, Northcutt, Villanti
Filed Date: 9/10/2004
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024