Stanford v. State , 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Affirmed. See Terry v. State, 808 So.2d 1249 (Fla.2002); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 862 So.2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Shaw v. State, 780 So.2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

    As this court did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 2003 WL 21697171, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003), supplemented on rehearing, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan.14, 2004).

    Affirmed; conflict certified.

    CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 2D04-2345

Citation Numbers: 884 So. 2d 400, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160, 2004 WL 2112725

Judges: Casanueva, Salcines, Silberman

Filed Date: 9/24/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024