George v. Taylor ( 2004 )

PER CURIAM.

The appellants challenge a summary final judgment and final judgment entered in favor of the appellee. Because a number of material facts remain in dispute, and because the appellee has not offered proof conclusively refuting the appellants’ affirmative defenses, see, e.g., Fasano v. Hicks, 667 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), the orders under review are reversed and this case is remanded.

ERVIN, ALLEN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.