All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2004-09 |
-
PER CURIAM. Petitioners seek review of a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment, in which they claimed entitlement to qualified immunity from respondent’s federal civil rights claims as a matter of law. Because the trial court did not rule that petitioners were not entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, the order is not appealable pursuant to Florida
*391 Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(vii). See Butler v. Dowling, 750 So.2d 674 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Treating the request as a petition for a writ of certiorari (id. at 675), we deny the request because petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the trial court’s order constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law.PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI DENIED.
WOLF, C.J.; BARFIELD and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 1D04-1674
Citation Numbers: 885 So. 2d 390, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14186, 2004 WL 2147005
Judges: Barfield, Webster, Wolf
Filed Date: 9/27/2004
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024