Albers v. Hines , 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14186 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Petitioners seek review of a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment, in which they claimed entitlement to qualified immunity from respondent’s federal civil rights claims as a matter of law. Because the trial court did not rule that petitioners were not entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, the order is not appealable pursuant to Florida *391Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(vii). See Butler v. Dowling, 750 So.2d 674 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Treating the request as a petition for a writ of certiorari (id. at 675), we deny the request because petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the trial court’s order constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law.

    PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI DENIED.

    WOLF, C.J.; BARFIELD and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 1D04-1674

Citation Numbers: 885 So. 2d 390, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14186, 2004 WL 2147005

Judges: Barfield, Webster, Wolf

Filed Date: 9/27/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024