State v. Daniels ( 2005 )

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order suppressing statements made by appellee defendant to the police, both at his residence and later at the police station. The trial court granted the motion because the court found that the statements were made while defendant was being detained without probable cause. There is ample evidence in the record to support this finding, and we accordingly affirm. State v. C.F., 798 So.2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.