Thomas v. State ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Appellant appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm as we conclude that all claims raised in the motion are legally insufficient. However, as to the claim for additional jail credit, our affirmance is without prejudice for the defendant to seek an administrative remedy. See Hidalgo v. State, 729 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

    WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 4D04-4627

Judges: Hazouri, Shahood, Warner

Filed Date: 2/9/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024