All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2005-03 |
-
PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 24, 2005, the Court has determined that the appellant’s untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition of the underlying final judgment. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Thus, the notice of appeal was insufficient to timely invoke the Court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.
WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 1D04-5630
Citation Numbers: 894 So. 2d 1082, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2668, 2005 WL 491407
Judges: Hawkes, Padovano, Webster
Filed Date: 3/4/2005
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024