Jackson v. State , 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3315 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Affirmed. See Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 888 So.2d 621 (Fla.2004). After this court held in Boyd that a claim of vindictive sentencing is not cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the Fifth District in Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), reversed a circuit court order denying a rule 3.800(a) motion and remanded for consideration of the claim of vindictive sentencing raised in the motion. We certify direct conflict with Johnson.

    Affirmed; conflict certified.

    KELLY, CANADY, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 2D04-5231

Citation Numbers: 895 So. 2d 1275, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3315, 2005 WL 563118

Judges: Canady, Kelly, Wallace

Filed Date: 3/11/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024