Sinclair v. State , 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3563 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 3D05-374

Citation Numbers: 897 So. 2d 545, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3563, 2005 WL 602623

Judges: Green, Ramirez, Wells

Filed Date: 3/16/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024