All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2005-04 |
-
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Appellant’s claim that the rule of sequestration was violated is refuted by Nieves v. State, 739 So.2d 125 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). His claim that the state committed a discovery violation is not preserved and, in any event, the violation was not prejudicial.
WARNER, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 4D04-380
Citation Numbers: 899 So. 2d 452, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4652, 2005 WL 767081
Judges: Gross, Warner
Filed Date: 4/6/2005
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024