Zambrana v. State , 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10474 ( 2005 )

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

The defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for clarification of the sentences imposed in case numbers 99-25569 and 01-25865(A) which she claims should reflect the imposition of concurrent sentences. As the trial court has subsequently conformed the written judgments and sentences to reflect its oral pronouncement and has now corrected the sentences to run concurrent, we conclude that the defendant’s appeal is now moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot.