All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2005-07 |
-
PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of March 25, 2005, the Court has determined that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the order on appeal is a final order or an otherwise appealable nonfinal order. See Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So.2d 215, 215-16 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (dismissing the appeal of an order granting a motion to award attorney’s fees and costs but reserving jurisdiction to determine the amount). For this reason, the appeal is hereby dismissed.
BROWNING, POLSTON AND HAWKES, JJ., Concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 1D05-2269
Citation Numbers: 906 So. 2d 357, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10911, 2005 WL 1651705
Judges: Browning, Hawkes, Polston
Filed Date: 7/15/2005
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024