Brantley v. State , 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11842 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    The appellant challenges the denial of a motion to suppress, after which he entered a nolo plea. Because the plea was entered without reserving any issue for appeal, the ruling which the appellant challenges is not reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2). The appellant’s convictions are therefore affirmed.

    ALLEN, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 1D03-3522

Citation Numbers: 907 So. 2d 688, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11842, 2005 WL 1788883

Judges: Allen, Benton, Wolf

Filed Date: 7/29/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024