Florida Wildlife Federation v. St. Johns County , 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11002 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    The appellants have not demonstrated that their business interests are “adversely affected” by the challenged order, so as to give them standing to appeal. See Melzer v. Florida Department of Community Affairs, 881 So.2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); O’Connel v. Florida Department of Community Affairs, 874 So.2d 673 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). The appeal is therefore DISMISSED.

    BARFIELD and HAWKES, JJ., concur; BENTON, J., dissents.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 1D04-3511

Citation Numbers: 909 So. 2d 347, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11002, 2005 WL 1660806

Judges: Barfield, Benton, Hawkes

Filed Date: 7/18/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024