All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2005-07 |
-
PER CURIAM. The appellants have not demonstrated that their business interests are “adversely affected” by the challenged order, so as to give them standing to appeal. See Melzer v. Florida Department of Community Affairs, 881 So.2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); O’Connel v. Florida Department of Community Affairs, 874 So.2d 673 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). The appeal is therefore DISMISSED.
BARFIELD and HAWKES, JJ., concur; BENTON, J., dissents.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 1D04-3511
Citation Numbers: 909 So. 2d 347, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11002, 2005 WL 1660806
Judges: Barfield, Benton, Hawkes
Filed Date: 7/18/2005
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024