 |
All Courts |
 |
Federal Courts |
|
US Federal District Court Cases |
|
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
|
2005-09 |
-
PER CURIAM. We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burch
*851 field v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).AFFIRMED.
KAHN, C.J., WOLF and PADOVANO, concur.
Document Info
Docket Number： No. 1D05-1585
Citation Numbers： 911 So. 2d 850, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14679, 2005 WL 2254115
Judges： Kahn, Padovano, Wolf
Filed Date： 9/19/2005
Precedential Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/18/2024