Flores v. State , 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18658 ( 2005 )

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005.)

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.