All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2005-12 |
-
PER CURIAM. In this purported habeas corpus proceeding, Israel Camellón claims that he was denied due process by not having ap
*229 pellate counsel appointed during an evi-dentiary hearing of a post-conviction relief motion. We observe, however, that not only is Camellon’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus procedurally barred, the record reflects that no request was made by Camellón for a court appointed counsel for his post-conviction evidentiary hearing, thus the court cannot be said to have abused its discretion by not appointing counsel.1 The petition is denied.
. Wheeler v. State, 807 So.2d 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 3D05-714
Citation Numbers: 922 So. 2d 228, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 2005 WL 3536099
Judges: Fletcher, Ramirez, Suarez
Filed Date: 12/28/2005
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024