Cargile v. State ( 2006 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to whatever right Mr. Cargile may have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. See Hitchcock v. State, 866 So.2d 23 (Fla.2004).

    CASANUEVA, STRINGER, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 2D06-2455

Judges: Casanueva, Stringer, Villanti

Filed Date: 9/29/2006

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024