Rogers v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    KENNETH G. ROGERS,                 )
    )
    Appellant,              )
    )
    v.                                 )                             Case No. 2D14-503
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                  )
    )
    Appellee.               )
    ___________________________________)
    Opinion filed September 12, 2014.
    Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
    9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
    Polk County; Charles B. Curry, Judge.
    PER CURIAM.
    The postconviction court denied Kenneth G. Rogers' motion filed under
    Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 on the ground that it was untimely. In the
    postconviction court proceedings, the State argued, and the postconviction court
    agreed, that the motion filed on March 6, 2013, was untimely because it was filed more
    than two years following his sentencing after violation of probation on February 18,
    2008. Rogers did not immediately appeal the 2008 judgments and sentences but later
    filed a successful petition for belated appeal within the time limit provided under Florida
    Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(5). Although both the State and the
    postconviction court were aware that Rogers had filed a successful petition for belated
    appeal in this court, they overlooked its significance.1
    Once this court granted Rogers' petition for belated appeal, appellate case
    number 2D10-4415 was initiated. This court affirmed Rogers' judgments and sentences
    and issued its mandate on March 7, 2012. The time for Rogers to file a motion under
    rule 3.850(b) then began to run on the date of this court's mandate. See Twardokus v.
    State, 
    69 So. 3d 359
    , 360 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Thus, Rogers' motion was timely filed,
    and the postconviction court should have reviewed it on the merits.
    Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
    NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and BLACK, Concur.
    1
    In contrast, "[t]he filing of an unsuccessful petition for belated appeal
    does not toll the rendition of a judgment and sentence for purposes of calculating the
    two-year window." Martin v. State, 
    941 So. 2d 1173
    , 1173 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (citing
    Jones v. State, 
    922 So. 2d 1088
     (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D14-503

Judges: Black, Morris, Northcutt, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 9/12/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024