Clark v. Clark , 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18864 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    MICHELE J. CLARK,                   )
    )
    Appellant,               )
    )
    v.                                  )                   Case No. 2D14-1514
    )
    LAWRENCE R. CLARK,                  )
    )
    Appellee.                )
    ___________________________________ )
    Opinion filed November 19, 2014.
    Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130
    from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough
    County; Nick Nazaretian, Judge.
    Robert M. Tager, Clearwater, for Appellant.
    Donald A. Foster of The Foster Law
    Group, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
    SILBERMAN, Judge.
    In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, Michele J. Clark (the Wife)
    appeals a nonfinal order entitled "Order on Wife's Motion for Contempt." In the order,
    the trial court stated that it was sua sponte reducing the Wife's previously ordered
    temporary support but did not rule on the Wife's contempt motion. The order resulted
    from a noticed contempt hearing against Lawrence R. Clark (the Husband), and the
    Husband had not filed a motion to reduce the temporary support.
    Because the Wife had no notice that the issue of a modification of
    temporary support would be considered at the contempt hearing, the Husband properly
    concedes error on appeal, citing Wright v. Wright, 
    654 So. 2d 674
    , 674 (Fla. 5th DCA
    1995), and Dent v. Dent, 
    851 So. 2d 819
    , 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (Stringer, J.,
    concurring specially). Based on the lack of notice and a meaningful opportunity to be
    heard, see Wright, 654 So. 2d at 674, we reverse the Order on Wife's Motion for
    Contempt that was rendered on March 17, 2014. We remand for reinstatement of the
    temporary support obligation ordered on September 24, 2012.1 See id.
    Reversed and remanded.
    VILLANTI and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
    1
    In the Wife's reply brief, counsel suggests that we order the Husband to
    pay the Wife's attorney's fees incurred in this appeal. We decline to do so because a
    motion for appellate attorney's fees has not been filed in compliance with Florida Rule of
    Appellate Procedure 9.400(b).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D14-1514

Citation Numbers: 150 So. 3d 1221, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18864, 2014 WL 6464512

Judges: Silberman, Villanti, Crenshaw

Filed Date: 11/19/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024