United Automobile Insurance Company and James Baylis v. Riverside Medical Associates, Inc., a/a/o Normandel Burke, Ismail Sarabi and Jorge De La O ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •        DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and JAMES BAYLIS,
    Petitioners,
    v.
    RIVERSIDE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.,
    a/a/o NORMANDEL BURKE, ISMAIL SARABI and JORGE DE LA O,
    Respondents.
    No. 4D14-1535
    [March 4, 2015]
    Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
    Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Thomas Lynch, IV, Judge; L.T. Case
    No. 13-13358 CACE05.
    Thomas L. Hunker, Miami, for petitioners.
    Philip D. Parrish of Philip D. Parrish, P.A., Miami, and Henry A.
    Seiden, West Palm Beach, for respondents.
    PER CURIAM.
    Defendants United Automobile Insurance Company and James Baylis
    seek certiorari review of the circuit court’s nonfinal order: (1) denying
    their motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s premature bad faith action; and (2)
    overruling their objections to the plaintiff’s premature bad faith discovery
    requests.
    We grant the petition as to the discovery objections. See State Farm
    Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Tranchese, 
    49 So. 3d 809
    , 810 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
    (granting petition for certiorari on the basis that, “until the obligation to
    provide coverage and damages has been determined, a party is not
    entitled to discovery related to the claims file[] or to the insurer’s
    business policies or practices regarding handling of claims”) (citation
    omitted).
    We dismiss the petition as to the denial of the motion to dismiss. See
    State Farm Ins. Co. v. Ulrich, 
    120 So. 3d 217
    , 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“A
    nonfinal order denying a motion to dismiss an insurance bad faith action
    is not subject to interlocutory review via petition for writ of certiorari.”).
    However, our dismissal is without prejudice to the defendants’ moving to
    abate the bad faith action. See Tranchese, 
    49 So. 3d at 810
     (“We grant
    the petition [for certiorari] as to the abatement, because the final
    determination of coverage and damages for the underlying claim has not
    been made, which must precede a statutory bad faith action.”).
    Petition granted in part, dismissed in part.
    GROSS, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
    *         *           *
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 4D14-1535

Judges: Gross, Ciklin, Gerber

Filed Date: 3/4/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024