Quinten Walden v. State , 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15239 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •        DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    July Term 2014
    QUINTEN WALDEN,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Respondent.
    No. 4D12-1537
    [October 1, 2014]
    Petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel to the Circuit Court
    for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Susan Lebow,
    Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-12359 CF10A.
    Quinten Walden, Jasper, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Monique Rolla,
    Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent.
    ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
    PER CURIAM.
    The Florida Supreme Court has remanded this matter for
    reconsideration in light of Williams v. State, 
    123 So. 3d 23
     (Fla. 2013). We
    conclude that appellate counsel did not provide ineffective assistance in
    the direct appeal. Counsel argued the fundamental error in the attempted
    voluntary manslaughter jury instruction, moved for rehearing and
    certification of the issue, and asked this Court to provide a citation to
    Williams v. State, 
    40 So. 3d 72
     (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). In the direct appeal,
    we affirmed this issue without comment and did not provide a citation.
    Walden v. State, 
    57 So. 3d 248
    , 252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).
    The Florida Supreme Court ultimately quashed our decision in
    Williams. If this Court had provided a citation to Williams, where we had
    certified a question of great public importance and conflict on the issue,
    Walden could have obtained relief from the Florida Supreme Court and
    would be entitled to a new trial.1
    Because it would be manifestly unjust to deny him the same remedy,
    we grant habeas corpus relief. See De La Hoz v. Crews, 
    123 So. 3d 101
    (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 
    132 So. 3d 223
     (Fla. 2013). Petitioner’s
    conviction for attempted second degree murder is vacated, and the case is
    remanded for a new trial.
    Petition granted; remanded for a new trial.
    STEVENSON, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
    *         *         *
    1 See, e.g., Rodriguez v. State, 
    139 So. 3d 489
     (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Fenster v.
    State, 
    141 So. 3d 232
     (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Lopez v. State, 
    138 So. 3d 488
     (Fla.
    4th DCA 2014); Davis v. State, 
    138 So. 3d 489
     (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Sessions v.
    State, 
    137 So. 3d 1167
     (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Coriolan v. State, 
    137 So. 3d 1080
    (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Cunningham v. State, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D451 (Fla. 4th DCA
    Feb. 26, 2014); Cox v. State, 
    132 So. 3d 956
     (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Morgan v. State,
    
    132 So. 3d 930
     (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Williams v. State, 
    121 So. 3d 634
     (Fla. 4th
    DCA 2013).
    2