All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2016-04 |
-
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN HENRY MEADOR, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D14-4314 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed April 12, 2016. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Michael Jones, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant, John Henry Meador, raises two issues on appeal, challenging his judgment and five consecutive mandatory minimum sentences for five counts of aggravated assault with actual possession of a firearm, arising from a single criminal episode. We affirm the first issue without comment, and write only to address Meador’s assertion that the trial court erroneously determined it was required under section 775.087(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2013), to impose the mandatory minimum sentences consecutively. On March 3, 2016, the Florida Supreme Court issued its opinion in Williams v. State, 41 Fla. L. Weekly S73 (Fla. Mar. 3, 2016), addressing whether section 775.087(2)(d) requires consecutive sentences for offenses arising from a single criminal episode. The court answered the question in the negative, holding that if the defendant discharges the firearm, consecutive sentences are permissible but not mandatory. Id. at S74. However, the court held that where a defendant does not discharge the firearm, the mandatory minimum sentences must be imposed concurrently. Id. Here, Meador was charged and convicted for five counts of aggravated assault wherein he displayed, but did not discharge a firearm. Accordingly, we are constrained to vacate Meador’s consecutive sentences and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion. AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED. WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR. 2
Document Info
Docket Number: 1D14-4314
Citation Numbers: 187 So. 3d 1283, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5541
Judges: Wolf, Rowe, Swanson
Filed Date: 4/12/2016
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024