Swarz v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    JOSHUA A. SWARZ,                            )
    )
    Appellant,                     )
    )
    v.                                          )       Case No. 2D15-179
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                           )
    )
    Appellee.                      )
    )
    Opinion filed March 23, 2016.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee
    County; Edward Nicholas, Judge.
    Andrea Flynn Mogensen of Law Office
    of Andrea Flynn Mogensen, Sarasota,
    for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley,
    Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for
    Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Joshua A. Swarz appeals the sentences imposed in trial court case
    numbers 10-CF-3877 and 11-CF-1117 after the revocation of his probation in those
    cases based upon his commission of new law violations. Mr. Swarz also appeals the
    judgments and sentences imposed for the new law violations in trial court case numbers
    2013-CF-3090, 2013-CF-3119, and 2013-CF-3321. We affirm in all respects.
    Mr. Swarz was fifteen years old at the time of his offense in case number
    10-CF-3877 and sixteen years old at the time of his offense in case number 11-CF-
    1117. He was prosecuted as an adult and sentenced as a youthful offender for those
    cases. Upon the revocation of his probation, the trial court sentenced him to seven
    years' prison in each case. Although the seven-year sentences imposed upon the
    revocation of probation were not subject to the six-year sentencing cap because the
    violations were substantive, see Lee v. State, 
    67 So. 3d 1199
    , 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA
    2011), the trial court was nevertheless required to maintain his youthful offender status
    upon revocation of his probation, 
    id.
     On the new sentencing documents for these two
    cases, the trial court did not check the box indicating that Mr. Swarz was being
    sentenced as a youthful offender. Mr. Swarz has not raised this error in this appeal.
    Accordingly, our affirmance of Mr. Swarz’s judgment and sentences is
    without prejudice to his right to file a motion to correct an illegal sentence under Florida
    Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).
    Affirmed.
    WALLACE, LaROSE, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D15-179

Judges: Wallace, Larose, Badalamenti

Filed Date: 3/23/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024