Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority v. Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp. ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed February 15, 2017.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D16-2899
    Lower Tribunal No. 12-46272
    ________________
    Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority,
    Petitioner,
    vs.
    Electronic Transaction Consultants Corporation,
    Respondent.
    A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Prohibition.
    Holland & Knight LLP, and Rodolfo Sorondo, Jr. and Christopher N.
    Bellows, for petitioner.
    Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli, P.A., and Michael Piscitelli and Bradley S.
    Copenhaver (Ft. Lauderdale), for respondent.
    Before SUAREZ, C.J., and ROTHENBERG and SALTER, JJ.
    ROTHENBERG, J.
    Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority (“MDX”) seeks a writ of
    prohibition disqualifying the trial judge and an order remanding the case to the
    circuit court for the reassignment of the case to another judge.        Because we
    conclude that the motion to disqualify the trial judge filed below was both timely
    and legally sufficient, disqualification is required. See Wolfson v. Wolfson, 
    159 So. 3d 394
    , 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (finding that disqualification is required
    where the trial judge’s comments suggested that she had prejudged the case);
    Wade v. Wade, 
    123 So. 3d 697
    , 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (holding that
    disqualification is required where the trial court announced its ruling before
    hearing all of the evidence); Cummings v. Montalvo, 
    135 So. 3d 389
    , 389 (Fla. 5th
    DCA 2014) (finding that disqualification was required because the judge’s
    statements reflected that she had prejudged a party’s credibility); Amato v. Winn
    Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James, 
    810 So. 2d 979
    , 980-83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
    (finding that disqualification was required where the trial court had issued an order
    on the merits before all of the evidence had been submitted, even though the trial
    court subsequently vacated the order).       We, therefore, grant the petition and
    remand for reassignment of the case to another judge.
    Petition granted.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 3D16-2899

Judges: Rothenberg, Salter, Suarez

Filed Date: 2/15/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024